Keywords
Collection #
Collection Name Collection #
Author Date
Description
Microfilm Number
Series Number

Item Information



Return to Collection Information

Return to Series Inventory
MSA SC 5339-230-12
CollectionResearch and Educational Projects at the Maryland State Archives
Author
Dates1901
Medium
Restrictions
StorageContact the Department of Special Collections for location.
Description
Roland Park Co. v. Hull, 92 Md. 301, 48 A. 366 (1901)

Appeal from Baltimore County Circuit Court

OVERVIEW: The principal ground relied upon by the developer in its bill to restrain the suit at law was the alleged fact that defendants sold the developer the land used by him as a disposal field for his subdivision and knew the exact purpose for which the land was purchased. The developer claimed that defendants were equitably estopped from claiming any damage for a nuisance, which made it impossible for defendants to sell their land or the lots, by reason of its maintenance. The court noted that the developer's defense was based upon an equitable estoppel. If the facts constituted an estoppel, they could be set up by way of defense at law as in equity. In order to justify a resort to a court of equity, it was necessary to show some ground of equity other than the estoppel itself. The second ground of relief alleged by the bill was to prevent a multiplicity of suits. Affirming, the court ruled that a court of equity could not exercise its jurisdiction for the purpose of preventing a multiplicity of suits in cases where the plaintiff invoking such jurisdiction did not have a prior existing cause of action, either equitable or legal, and no prior existing right to some relief.

Appellate Court Records:

COURT OF APPEALS (Docket) Roland Park Co. v. Hull, 1901, January Term, case no. 11, p. 220, MdHR 640 [MSA S412-14, 1/66/14/45]

COURT OF APPEALS (Opinions) Roland Park Co. v. Hull, 1901, January Term, case no. 11, MdHR 707-138 [MSA S393-124, 1/65/13/70]

COURT OF APPEALS (Records and Briefs) Roland Park Co. v. Hull, 1900, October Term, case no. 10 [MSA S1733-158, 1/65/2/7]

Trial Court Records:

BALTIMORE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT (Civil Docket) Hull v. Roland Park Co., Volume NMB 20 pp. 28 and 396, Case no. 2830, MdHR 20,222-19 [MSA C358-19, 2/48/14/19]

See also: BALTIMORE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT (Civil Docket) Hull v. Roland Park Co., Volume NMB 20, page 27, Case no. 2828, MdHR 20,222-19 [MSA C358-19, 2/48/14/19]

BALTIMORE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT (Civil Papers) Hull v. Roland Park Co., Box 278 No. 2830 [MSA T697-1, 2/54/14/2]
Note: No separate papers located for 2828.

Mapping:

Property located in the vicinity of Cold Spring Lane and Ashland Ave (now Wimslow Road?).

1898 Bromley Atlas of Baltimore County, plate 13, Detail of Evergreen

Google Map

Scanned as msaref 5458-51-4155

9 Files92_md_301.pdf
msa_sc5458_51_4155-1.pdf
msa_sc5458_51_4155-2.pdf
msa_sc5458_51_4155-4.pdf
msa_sc5458_51_4155-5.pdf
msa_sc5458_51_4155-4-2.pdf
msa_sc5458_51_4155-41.pdf
msa_sc5458_51_4155-3.pdf
msa_sc5458_51_4155-42.pdf

This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website


[ Archives' Home Page ||  Maryland Manual On-Line ||  Reference & Research
Search the Archives ||  Education & Outreach ||  Archives of Maryland Online ]


Governor    General Assembly    Judiciary    Maryland.Gov   


© Copyright May 14, 2024 Maryland State Archives