Keywords
Collection #
Collection Name Collection #
Author Date
Description
Microfilm Number
Series Number

Item Information



Return to Collection Information

Return to Series Inventory
MSA SC 5339-275-10
CollectionResearch and Educational Projects at the Maryland State Archives
Author
Dates
Medium
Restrictions
StorageContact the Department of Special Collections for location.
Description
**THIRTY HOGSHEADS OF SUGAR v. BOYLE 13 U.S. 191 (1815) 9 Cranch 191 PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Appellant claimant, a Danish citizen, sought review of the sentence of the Circuit Court for the District of Maryland, condemning his sugar, which was grown on his plantation in Santa Cruz, and put on board a vessel for shipment to England after the capture of that island by the British. The sugar was captured after the declaration of war by the United States against Great Britain, and libeled as British property by appellee privateers. OVERVIEW: The Santa Cruz inhabitants retained their property and were permitted to ship their produce, but only to Great Britain. The sugar was on board a British ship captured by the privateers and brought to the United States, where the vessel and cargo were libeled as enemy property. The claimant acquired the plantation while Santa Cruz was a Danish colony, and he withdrew from it after its capture. Affirming the decision, the Court explained that the claimant was incorporated, so far as respected his plantation in Santa Cruz, with the permanent interests of Santa Cruz, which was at that time, British. Although as a Dane, the claimant was at war with Great Britain, and an enemy; yet, the Court said, as a plantation owner in Santa Cruz, he was no enemy, and could have shipped his produce to Great Britain in perfect safety. The Court added that personal property may have followed the person anywhere, but land was fixed. Wherever the owner may have resided, the Court concluded that land was hostile or friendly according to the condition of the country in which it was placed. The claimant, with regard to his land, while he remained unchanged, was subject to the same disabilities as the land. OUTCOME: The Court affirmed the decision condemning, as enemy property, the sugar belonging to the claimant, a Danish owner of a plantation on an island that had been captured by the British. War of 1812; Privateer capture of British cargo Opinion: Marhshall, C.J. ,Todd absent Counsel: Harper for Danish owner; Pinkney for Privateer

This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website


[ Archives' Home Page ||  Maryland Manual On-Line ||  Reference & Research
Search the Archives ||  Education & Outreach ||  Archives of Maryland Online ]


Governor    General Assembly    Judiciary    Maryland.Gov   


© Copyright May 10, 2024 Maryland State Archives