| Andy Baida, et. al., Motion for Summary Judgement in Virginia v. Maryland
Received: from campus3.mdarchives.state.md.us (firewall-user@campus3 [172.16.1.93])
by archive5.mdarchives.state.md.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA12059
for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 00:01:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: by campus3.mdarchives.state.md.us; id AAA06496; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 00:01:19 -0500
Received: from unknown(172.16.4.39) by campus3.mdarchives.state.md.us via smap (V5.5)
id xma006459; Fri, 7 Dec 01 00:00:53 -0500
Message-Id: <4.1.20011207000006.0091eba0@archive5.mdarchives.state.md.us>
X-Sender: edp@archive5.mdarchives.state.md.us
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 00:00:25 +0800
To: edp@mdarchives.state.md.us
From: Ed Papenfuse
Subject: Fwd: Re: Maryland's brief
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-UIDL: Z'R"!J>6!!:<`!!aLD!!
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 22:50:49 +0800
To: "Andrew Baida"
From: Ed Papenfuse
Subject: Re: Maryland's brief
Bcc: chrisa@mdarchives.state.md.us
Andy:
Most impressive. You and the team have put together a lucid, compelling,
well-documented argument. By all rights, you ought to win at this stage.
Minor point: page 8, 11: should read "Commissioner of Land Patents," not the
"Commissioner of Land Records."
I look forward to reading the supporting documents.
Ed
At 04:30 PM 12/6/2001 -0500, you wrote:
Ed
Although you will be receiving a hard copy with exhibits, I thought you
might be interested in an e-mail version of the brief that Maryland will be
filing tomorrow with the Special Master. I know we've had our differences
and some heated moments, but I very much appreciated the work that your
office has done in connection with this case. Happy holidays.
Andy
|
