copies of synopsis of Pinkney Whyte's argument for Maryland in the Black-Jenkins Arbitration; a copy of the Maryland Assembly's supplementary act on Potomac navigation that was sent to Patrick Henry and a copy of a Reverdy Johnson 1859 opinion (private?) entitled "The Riparian Rights of Virginia Proprietors on the Potomac River." See Odynocki letter.
email re:
Received: from campus3.mdarchives.state.md.us (firewall-user@campus3 [172.16.1.93])
by archive5.mdarchives.state.md.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA03574
for ; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 10:10:17 -0500 (EST)
From: Mark_Odynocki@aporter.com
Received: by campus3.mdarchives.state.md.us; id KAA15153; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 10:13:15 -0500
Received: from unknown(151.173.170.12) by campus3.mdarchives.state.md.us via smap (V5.5)
id xma015118; Mon, 27 Nov 00 10:12:42 -0500
Message-Id:
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 10:11:22 -0500
To: edp@mdarchives.state.md.us
Subject: Re: Riparian rights opinion by Reverdy Johnson-REPLY
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: TFS Secure Messaging /400004000/400000061/400850001/400250024/
X-Mailer: Version 4.6 Build 121
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by archive5.mdarchives.state.md.us id KAA03574
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-UIDL: >pd!!iMQ!!3)M"!!f6!!
Dr. Papenfuse:
Sorry for the delay in responding to you. I got the Johnson opinion from the
George Washington University Law Library on microfiche.
I'll try to fit in a trip to the manuscript room sometime this week and let you
know what I find. I have the citations from your other e-mail.
Please write or call if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Mark
edp@mdarchives.state.md.us on 11/21/2000 04:56:16 PM
To: Mark Odynocki/LglSup/DC/ArnoldAndPorter@APORTER
cc:
Subject: Riparian rights opinion by Reverdy Johnson
Mark:
How did you get to this offprint? Did you find it on film at the LC? The
original seems to be at Harvard.
I think the opinion expressed in it is obviated by later court decisions, but
we'll see.
Ed |