|
|
MSA SC 5339-264-2
|
|
Sharifdzada
|
|
|
|
Contact the Department of Special Collections for location.
|
Description
In re Maddox
93 Md. 727 (1901).
See biography of Etta Haynie Maddox for additional resources.
COURT OF APPEALS (Bar Applications) Etta H.
Maddox, April Term 1902 [MSA S112, 2/51/4/4].
COURT OF APPEALS (Docket) In Re: Etta H. Maddox,
Volume AR 1 Page 303 [MSA S412-14, 1/66/14/45].
COURT OF APPEALS (Opinions) Brief submitted by Etta Maddox
through her attorney, October Term 1901 #110 [ MSA S393-127, 1/65/13/73].
COURT OF APPEALS (Opinions) Re: Maddox, October Term
1901 #110 [ MSA S393-127, 1/65/13/73].
GENERAL ASSEMBLY (Laws) 1892 Regular Session,
Chapter 37, pp. 50-51 [MdHR 820955-1, 2/2/6/24].
GENERAL ASSEMBLY (Laws) 1898 Regular Session,
Chapter 139, pp. 599-601 [MdHR 820958, 2/2/6/25].
GENERAL ASSEMBLY (Laws) 1902 Regular Session,
Chapter 399 p. 566, [MdHR 820961, 2/2/6/26].
COURT OF APPEALS (Test Book) Etta Haynie Maddox, 11
September 1902, Volume RWG 1 Page 189 [MSA S 431-1, 1/66/14/12].
Note that Belva Lockwood's efforts to be admitting to the bar at the county courts level in Maryland are on her bio page at:
http://msa.maryland.gov/msa/speccol/sc3500/sc3520/015800/015841/html/msa15841.html
See also ecpclio entry MSA SC 5339-160-8:
In 1880, Belva A. Lockwood became the first woman lawyer admitted to the bar in Maryland. Already a licensed attorney in the District of Columbia, Ms. Lockwood was admitted to the bar of the Frederick County Circuit Court by petition on March 8, 1880. This was not Ms. Lockwood's first attempt to gain bar admission in Maryland, having been denied admission to the bar of the Prince George's County County on October 16, 1878. She was later admitted in Prince George's County on October 12, 1892. Ms. Lockwood's efforts to be admitted in Carroll County in May 1881 were successful, and evidence suggests that she also unsuccessfully sought admission in Charles County in July 1881. p
The intern who worked on the Finding Justice project last semester was David Nohe, dnohe001@umaryland.edu.
|
|
MSA SC 5339-264-3
|
|
Malcolm
|
|
|
|
Contact the Department of Special Collections for location.
|
Description
Clark v. Maryland Institute for the Promotion of Mechanic Arts
87 Md. 643, 41 A. 126 (1898).
Shepard's results as of 4/5/2007
COURT OF APPEALS (Briefs), Clark vs. Maryland Institute, April Term 1898, April Term 1898 Case No. 9, pages 1-25, (borrowed from COA)
Baltimore City Superior Court Records
Appellant's Brief
Appellee's Brief
COURT OF APPEALS (Minutes) Clark vs. Maryland Institute, Volume JFF 1 pp. 398 and 432 [MSA S424, 1/66/12/45]
COURT OF APPEALS (Opinions) Clark vs. Maryland Institute,
April Term 1898 Case No. 9 [MSA S393, 1/65/13/63]
COURT OF APPEALS (Docket) Clark vs. Maryland
Institute, April Term 1898 No. 9, Volume AR 1 folio 28, [MSA S412, 1/66/14/45]
COURT OF APPEALS (Docket) Clark vs. Maryland
Institute, January Term 1898, Volume AR 1 page 11, [MSA S412, 1/66/14/45]
COURT OF APPEALS (Docket) Clark vs. Maryland
Institute, October Term 1897, Volume JFF 1 page 449, [MSA S412, 1/66/14/44]
BALTIMORE CITY SUPERIOR COURT (Cases
Instituted) Number 504, Clark vs. Maryland Institute, 1897 [MSA C1497, MdHR 50,336-49, 2/16/11/35]
COURT OF APPEALS (Maryland Reports) Clark vs. Maryland
Institute, Volume 87 pp. 643-664, 2/6/10/26.
See also: Norris v. Mayor and City
Council of Baltimore, 78 F.Supp. 451 (D. Md., 1948).
|
|
MSA SC 5339-264-4
|
|
1913-1925
|
|
|
|
Contact the Department of Special Collections for location.
|
Description
Jackson v. State
132 Md. 311 (1918)
Baltimore City Law Department, case files, In the matter of William T. Coleman for writ of habeas corpus, U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland; Segregation Cases, 1917-1919, case no. 22845, box no. 175 [BRG13-2-129-1, BC/29/05/037].
1919
Opinion of the Baltimore City Solicitor
http://msa.maryland.gov/megafile/ecpdata/webroot/msaref07/bca_rg13_01/html/bca_rg13_01_sm117-0649.html
1915
October Term (Records and Briefs) [C.C.M. No. 154]
(borrowed from the Court of Appeals)
Baltimore City Criminal Court Records
Appellant's Brief
Brief of State of Maryland, Appellee
10"x8", 36 pages (No. 13)
1913
Baltimore Segregation Ordinance No. 339 [September 25]
1915-1919
Court of Appeals (Docket)page 33 (No. 13) and page 143 (No. 1)
[MSA S 412-17; 1/67/6/3]
Court of Appeals (Opinions)
January Term 1918, No. 1 [MSA S 393-178; 1/65/14/28]
1917-1920
Court of Appeals (Minutes)[MSA S 424-13; 1/66/13/6]
1915
Court of Appeals (Briefs) October Term
[MSA T 2088; 1/65/4/75]
Appellant's Brief
Brief of State of Maryland, Appellee
Baltimore City Criminal Court transcripts
1914
Baltimore City Criminal Court (Recognizance Docket) Volume 14, September p. 194, No. 594 [MSA T 490, 3/30/8/25]
1915
Baltimore City Court of Common Pleas (Cases Instituted) No. 70 April, p. 111 [MSA T 511-62; 3/2/11/17]
1914-1925
Baltimore City Court of Common Pleas (Judgements, Index)1914-1926 (February) [MSA T 501-14; 3/2/13/2]
David Bogen's essay on Race and the Law in Maryland includes reference to amicus brief.
|
|
MSA SC 5339-264-5
|
|
Nikolov
|
|
|
|
Contact the Department of Special Collections for location.
|
Description
Russell I. Diggs v. Morgan College
133 Md. 264 (1918)
OVERVIEW:
LEXIS 125
CASE SUMMARY:
Plaintiffs were adjacent landowners who filed a bill in equity against defendant, Morgan College to enjoin it from using some of its acreage as building lots to for black residents. The
Circuit Court for Baltimore County (Maryland) sustained the college's demurrer and dismissed the landowners' bill. The landowners sought review by the Court of Appeals.
The college was chartered under 1890 Md. Laws ch. 326, as amended by 1900 Md. Laws ch. 357 to furnish instruction in the higher branches of learning to members of the black
race.
The college raised two principal arguments in its demurrer. First, were the college's threatened acts ultra vires? And, second, did an equity court have jurisdiction to grant relief to those
suffering irreparable
injury as a result of such ultra vires acts? The issue was whether the landowners, by reason of their adjacent holdings, could attack the college's acquisition of the property as being an act
in excess of the
corporate powers, which were always limited to the expressed powers contained in the charter and those necessarily incident thereto. The court held that: (1) the college's charter
powers were exceedingly
broad; (2) there was no definite limitation either upon the acreage or value of any land that the institution could own, occupy, use, and enjoy; (3) unless the college's intended actions
amount to a public
nuisance, the trial court had no jurisdiction to grant an injunction; and (4) a residential black neighborhood was not itself a public nuisance.
Appellate Court Records:
COURT OF APPEALS (Docket) Diggs v.
Morgan College, 1918,
October Term, case no. 2, p. 163, MdHR 19,492 [MSA S412-17, 1/67/6/3].
COURT OF APPEALS (Opinions) Diggs v.
Morgan College, 1918,
October Term, case no. 2, MdHR 707-194 [MSA S393-180, 1/65/14/30].
COURT OF APPEALS (Misc. Papers) Diggs
v. Morgan College,
1918, October Term, case no. 2, MdHR 708-61 [MSA S397-64, 1/65/7/2].
COURT OF APPEALS (Records and Briefs) Diggs v. Morgan College, 1918, October Term, case no. 2
Note: No Records and briefs; not listed in index or in volume. Letters in Misc. Papers indicate that both parties prepared and likely submitted briefs.
Trial Court Records:
BALTIMORE COUNTRY CIRCUIT COURT
(Equity Docket)
Diggs v. Morgan College, 1917, WPC 23, case no. 14377, p. 59, MdHR 20,227-23 [MSA C326-23, 2/49/8/22].
BALTIMORE COUNTRY CIRCUIT COURT
(Equity Papers)
Diggs v. Morgan College, 1917, case no. 14377, box no. 905 [MSA T696-239, 0/35/10/21].
Scanned as msaref 5458-51-4467
See: McConnell, Roland C. The History of Morgan Park: A Baltimore Neighborhood, 1817-1999. Baltimore, MD: Morgan Park Improvement Association, 2000.
MD F190 .7 .M66M35 2000Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSA SC 5339-264-8
|
|
Milburn
|
|
|
|
Contact the Department of Special Collections for location.
|
Description
Wanda Goetz and Charles Bell against Hiram E. Smith and Lulu E. Smith, his wife, and by Edward H. Phillips and Emma E. Phillips, his wife, and Peter F. Amer and Mary Amer, his
wife, against Frank A. Saunders and Edith M. Saunders, his wife.
GOETZ et al. v. SMITH et ux.; SAUNDERS et ux v. PHILLIPS et al., 191
Md. 707 (Nos. 46, 47, October Term, 1948)
COURT OF APPEALS
(Briefs) Goetz v. Smith, October Term 1948 No. 46 [T2088, 1/65/5/24]
COURT OF APPEALS
(Briefs) Saunders v. Smith, October Term 1948 No. 47 [T2088, 1/65/5/24]
COURT OF APPEALS (Miscellaneous Papers)
Goetz v. Smith, October Term 1948 No. 46 [MSA S 397-120, 1/65/8/14]
COURT OF APPEALS (Miscellaneous Papers)
Saunders, et al. v. Philllips, et al., October Term 1948 No. 47 [MSA S 397-120, 1/65/8/14]
COURT OF APPEALS (Opinions) Goetz v.
Smtih and Saunders v. Phillips, October Term 1948 Nos. 46 and 47 [MSA S 393-265, 1/66/6/15]
COURT OF APPEALS (Transcripts) Goetz v.
Smith, October Term 1948 No. 46 [MSA S 434-97, 1/67/11/4]
COURT OF APPEALS (Transcripts) Saunders
v. Phillips, October Term 1948 No. 47 [MSA S 434-97, 1/67/11/4]
Plats from equity in plats.net
COURT OF APPEALS (U.S. Supreme Court
Appeals) Phillips v. Saunders, October Term 1948 No. 47 [MSA S 450-1, 1/66/7/35]
ANNE
ARUNDEL COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT (Equity Papers) Edward H. Phillips and wife, et al. vs. Frank A. Saunders and wife, et al., 1946, Box 212 File No. 9103 [MSA T 71-202,
0/28/6/53]
Plats from equity in plats.net
ANNE
ARUNDEL COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT (Equity Papers) Wanda Goetz and Charles A. Bell vs. Hiram E. Smith and wife, 1946, Box 215 File No. 9161 [MSA T 71-205,
0/28/6/56]
"Remembering a park for all." The Baltimore Sun, 23 September
2002.
Related cases: Shelley v. Kraemer (334 U.S. 1), McGhee v. Sipes, Hurd
v. Hodge, Uriciolo v. Hodge.
Other cases involving Hiram E. Smith:
Bearman v. Roland Park Realty Co., 218 Md. 515 (No. 91, September Term,
1958)
Smith v. Smith, 227 Md. 355 (No. 126, September Term, 1961)
The Beechwood Forest properties were foreclosed on in 1962 and 1963:
ANNE
ARUNDEL COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT (Equity Papers) Doris L. Freeny, Assignee v. Hiram E. Smith and Lula E. Smith, Box 20 File No. 15028 [MSA T 71, 0/31/14/20]
ANNE
ARUNDEL COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT (Equity Papers) Alvin Lapides, Assignee v. Hiram Em Smith and Lula E. Smith, Box 27 File No. 15542 [MSA T 71, 0/31/14/27]
|
|
MSA SC 5339-264-9
|
|
Ciociola
|
|
|
|
Contact the Department of Special Collections for location.
|
Description
Winkler v. State
194 Md. 1 (1949)
Note: Writ of Certiorari denied by United States Supreme Court, Winkler, et al. v.
Maryland, 339 U.S. 919 (1950)
"Tennis,
Everyone?" The Sun, 24 April 2003.
COURT OF APPEALS CASE MATERIALS:
COURT
OF APPEALS (Briefs) Winkler, et al. v. State, October 1949 No. 25 [MSA T 2088,
1/65/5/27]
COURT
OF APPEALS (Transcripts) Winkler, et al. v. State, October 1949 No. 25 [MSA S 434,
1/67/11/32]
COURT
OF APPEALS (Miscellaneous Papers) Winkler, et al. v. State, October 1949 No. 25 [MSA
S 397, 1/65/8/17]
COURT
OF APPEALS (Opinions) Winkler, et al. v. State, October 1949 No. 25 [MSA S 393,
1/66/6/17]
COURT
OF APPEALS (U.S. Supreme Court Appeals) Winkler, et al. v. State, October 1949 No.
25 [MSA S 450, 1/66/7/35]
BALTIMORE CITY CRIMINAL COURT MATERIALS:
BALTIMORE CITY CRIMINAL COURT
(Criminal
Docket)
1948/05-1948/08, pps. 191-194 [MSA C 1849-163, 3/30/5/18]
BALTIMORE
CITY CRIMINAL COURT (Criminal Papers) May 1948 Term, Box 489 Indictment nos.
3069-3089 [MSA T 495-493, HF/3/27/73]
Note: Large file
Smith
Act Protest poster
Note: No reference to this case found in the finding aid for BALTIMORE CITY
CRIMINAL COURT (Transcripts) MSA T 496. This may be because transcripts were found
at the appellate level.
Attorney General case file no. 6870-1949; unable to locate in finding aid to Case Files.
Other Baltimore City Records:
Baltimore City Archives, Mayor's Office, D'Alesandro, Jr. Administrative Files, 1947-1953,
Negroes, box no. 282 [BRG9-23-22-3, BC/01/01/054].
Baltimore City Archives, Mayor's Office, D'Alesandro, Jr. Administrative Files, 1948,
Inter-racial relations, file no. 93, box no. 276 [BRG9-23-16-8, BC/01/01/048].
Baltimore City Archives, Department of Recreation and Parks, Meeting Minutes, Board of Park
Commissioners, 1946-1951 [BRG51-5-6-1, BC/21/04/028].
Unable to locate any BC Solicitor casefile.
Newspaper Coverage
"24 Defy Jim Crow Law, Arrested." Baltimore
Afro-American, 17 July
1948.
"To Face Issues in Tennis Case." Baltimore
Afro-American, 31 July
1948.
"Where Does the Mayor Stand?" Baltimore
Afro-American, 31 July
1948
"'Guilty' Tennis Players to Try Again." Baltimore
Afro-American, 6
November 1948.
"Half
Million Dollar Suit Demand End of Jim Crow. Afro-American (National edition), 18 September 1948.
"Menken
Calls Tennis Order Silly, Nefarious." The Sun, 9 November 1948.
H.L. Menken's last column, criticizing the case.
"Retrial Sought by Players in Mixed Tennis Matches. Afro-American (National edition), 13 November 1948.
"2nd
Interracial Tennis Party Repulsed at Park." Afro-American (National edition), 27 November 1948.
"Ruling in Tennis Case Scheduled." Baltimore
Afro-American, 22 January
1949.
Morris, Mae. "They Say Time Not Ripe for Integration."
Baltimore
Afro-American, 28 May 1949.
"Disturb Whose Peace?" Baltimore Afro-American, 15
October 1949.
"Lawyers Study Next Step in Fighting Park JC Here."
Baltimore
Afro-American, 2 January 1951.
The Baltimore City Park Board maintained scrapbooks of articles relating to Baltimore City parks. They are at the Baltimore City Archives, BCA_BRG51_1 and the series unit for the
period of the protest is BCA_BRG51_1_27, which covers the period October 1947 through December 1948. A sample pdf is uploaded here.
|
|
MSA SC 5339-264-10
|
|
Sharif
|
|
|
|
Contact the Department of Special Collections for location.
|
Description
McCready v. Byrd (195 Md. 131):
Ms. Esther McCready (second from left) with NAACP lawyers Thurgood
Marshall and Donald Murray in a 1950 photgraph from the Afro American.
SPECIAL COLLECTIONS (Thurgood Marshall Memorial Collection) MSA SC 4565.
When Esther McCready won admission to the University of Maryland's School
of Nursing, her attorney, Donald Gaines Murray fulfilled an obligation.
Aside from the obvious responsibility to his client, Miss McCready, Murray
repaid a debt to the Baltimore community, to the National Association for
the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), to his co-counsel Charles
H. Houston, and to himself. Fourteen years earlier, with the help of
the NAACP and Houston, Murray had established the legal foundations of
the case he later argued for McCready. Thus, in April 1950 things had come
full circle.
The opinion in the case, Esther McCready v. Harry C. Byrd, et al.,
handed down by the Court of Appeals in April 15, 1950 conveyed the influence
of the earlier Murray decision. This influence, the court held,
had effected not only on the state of Maryland, but also the decisions
of the U.S. Supreme Court. In cases of similar circumstance, decided between
1938 and 1948, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled as the Maryland Appelate Court
had in 1936 -- when states do not meet the "equal" provision of Plessy
v. Ferguson (1896), the group at the disadvantage were to attend the
available facilities with the favored group. "We cannot subtract anything
from what the Supreme Court has said," wrote Justice Markell, "It would
be superfluous to add anything."
Source: http://msa.maryland.gov/msa/stagser/s1259/121/1844/html/0000.html
an Ebook version of only the trial and appellate court papers will be found at:
Ebook of McCready v. Byrd case files
Related Court Cases:
BALTIMORE CITY COURT (Petition
Docket) Donald W. Stewart v. Byrd, et al., 1949, JOR 16, p. 72, case no. 13829 [MSA T549-13, 3/34/14/007].
BALTIMORE CITY COURT (Court Papers)
Donald W. Stewart v. Byrd, et al., 1949, case no. 13829, box no. 766 [MSA T545-824, 3/33/04/033].
BALTIMORE CITY COURT (Petition
Docket) Hiram L. Whittle v. Byrd, et al., 1949, JOR 16, p. 74, case no. 13830 [MSA T549-13, 3/34/14/007].
BALTIMORE CITY COURT (Court Papers)
1949, Hiram L. Whittle v. Byrd, et al., case no. 13830, box no. 766 [MSA T545-824, 3/33/04/033].
BALTIMORE CITY COURT (Petition
Docket) Lucille Williams v. Byrd, et al., 1949, JOR 16, p. 74, case no. 13831 [MSA T549-13, 3/34/14/007].
BALTIMORE CITY COURT (Court Papers)
Lucille Williams v. Byrd, et al., 1949, case no. 13831, box no. 766 [MSA T545-824, 3/33/04/033].
BALTIMORE CITY COURT (Petition
Docket) Richard Williams v. Byrd, et al., 1949, JOR 16, pp. 72, case no. 13832 [MSA T549-13, 3/34/14/007].
BALTIMORE CITY COURT (Court Papers)
Richard Williams v. Byrd, et al., 1949, case no. 13832, box no. 766 [MSA T545-824, 3/33/04/033].
|
|
MSA SC 5339-264-11
|
|
Dunning
|
|
|
|
Contact the Department of Special Collections for location.
|
Description
Board of Public Welfare v. Myers
224 Md 246 (1960)
Bill of complaint filed on behalf of Robert Myers, a minor, and others in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City on 26 February 1960. Subpoenas to answer bill of complaint issued to
various entities
representing the State Board of Public Welfare 26 February-10 March 1960. Demurrer and answer of State Board of Public Welfare et al. to bill of complaint filed 19 March 1960.
Motion for hearing filed
on behalf of the plaintiff on 22 April 1960; petition and order to take testimony under 560th rule filed on the same date, 22 April 1960. Summons for witnesses on behalf of the
defendants filed on 2 June
1960 and on behalf of the plaintiffs on 3 June 1960. Case argued in Baltimore City Circuit Court before Judge Charles E. Moylan on 6 June 1960. Opinion of the court issued by Judge
Moylan on 1 July
1960, filed later on 6 July 1960. Declaratory decree filed on 6 July 1960 adjudge, ordered, declared and decreed that the defendants are “permanently enjoined and restrained from
denying to the Plaintiff
and other Negro youths, solely on account of race and color, commitment, admission and transfer to any Training School established, operated and maintained by the State of
Maryland.”
Appeal to the Court of Appeals of Maryland filed on behalf of the State Board of Public Welfare on 7 July 1960. Petition to extend the time for transmitting record to the Court of
Appeals filed by the
State Board of Public Welfare on 29 July 1960; order granting extension filed on 29 July 1960. Testimony of 6 June filed on 2 August 1960; plaintiff’s exhibits 1-5 and defendant’s
exhibit 1 filed on 3 August
1960. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City filed on 8 August 1960. Petition by Maryland Petition Committee, Inc. to file brief amicus curiae granted on 14 December 1960.
Decree modified, and
as modified affirmed, costs to be paid by the appellants on 7 February 1961. Opinion filed in Court of Appeals by Judge Henderson on 7 February 1961. Mandate by Court of Appeals
of Maryland issued
on 9 March 1961, filed on 10 March 1961. Modified declaratory decree issued by Judge Moylan in Baltimore City Circuit Court on 11 May 1961.
Trial Court Records:
BALTIMORE CITY JUVENILE COURT (Juvenile Docket) Robert Myers, Minor, 13 years of age, 1959, Docket no. 65544 [MSA T1778-237 or T1778-238 3/31/14/48 or
3/31/14/49]
RESTRICTED--not scanned
BALTIMORE CITY JUVENILE COURT (Juvenile Papers) Robert Myers, Minor, 13 years of age, 7 October 1959, Docket no. 65544, box no. 148 [MSA T462-148,
OR/4/20/25]
RESTRICTED--not scanned
BALTIMORE
CITY
CIRCUIT COURT
(Equity Docket A, Miscellaneous) Myers, Minor, etc. v. State Board of Public Welfare et al., 1960, 100A, Part 2, pp. 142, 449, case no. A40055 [MSA T55-113,
1/20/11/67]
BALTIMORE
CITY
CIRCUIT COURT
(Equity Papers A, Miscellaneous) Myers, Minor, etc. v. State Board of Public Welfare et al., 1960, case no. A40055, box no. 1837, [MSA T53-5455, 3/10 /4/19] Contains
One (1) Sealed
Envelope; not scanned
Appellate Court Records:
COURT OF
APPEALS (Records and
Briefs) State Board of Public Welfare et al. v. Myers, Minor, etc., 1960, September Term, no. 162 [MSA S1733-1626, 1/27/5/53]
COURT OF
APPEALS (Opinions) State
Board of Public Welfare et al. v. Myers, Minor, etc., 1960, September Term, no. 162, MdHR 16,892-3 [MSA S393-301, 1/66/6/47]
COURT OF
APPEALS (Miscellaneous
Papers) State Board of Public Welfare et al. v. Myers, Minor etc., 1960, September Term no. 162, MdHR 16,384-4 [MSA S397-172, 1/65/9/21]
Other Records:
Attorney General's Opinion, vol. 44, p. 123-125
(1959).
Scanned as msaref 5458-51-3511
|
|
|
|
MSA SC 5339-264-15
|
|
Yi
|
|
|
|
Contact the Department of Special Collections for location.
|
Description
Wanda Goetz and Charles Bell against Hiram E. Smith and Lulu E. Smith, his wife, and by Edward H. Phillips and Emma E. Phillips, his wife, and Peter F. Amer and Mary Amer, his wife, against Frank A. Saunders and Edith M. Saunders, his wife.
GOETZ et al. v. SMITH et ux.; SAUNDERS et ux v. PHILLIPS et al., 191 Md. 707 (Nos. 46, 47, October Term, 1948)
COURT OF APPEALS (Briefs) Goetz v. Smith, October Term 1948 No. 46 [T2088, 1/65/5/24]
COURT OF APPEALS (Briefs) Saunders v. Smith, October Term 1948 No. 47 [T2088, 1/65/5/24]
COURT OF APPEALS (Miscellaneous Papers) Goetz v. Smith, October Term 1948 No. 46 [MSA S 397-120, 1/65/8/14]
COURT OF APPEALS (Miscellaneous Papers) Saunders, et al. v. Philllips, et al., October Term 1948 No. 47 [MSA S 397-120, 1/65/8/14]
COURT OF APPEALS (Opinions) Goetz v. Smtih and Saunders v. Phillips, October Term 1948 Nos. 46 and 47 [MSA S 393-265, 1/66/6/15]
COURT OF APPEALS (Transcripts) Goetz v. Smith, October Term 1948 No. 46 [MSA S 434-97, 1/67/11/4]
COURT OF APPEALS (Transcripts) Saunders v. Phillips, October Term 1948 No. 47 [MSA S 434-97, 1/67/11/4]
Plats from equity in plats.net
COURT OF APPEALS (U.S. Supreme Court Appeals) Phillips v. Saunders, October Term 1948 No. 47 [MSA S 450-1, 1/66/7/35]
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT (Equity Papers) Edward H. Phillips and wife, et al. vs. Frank A. Saunders and wife, et al., 1946, Box 212 File No. 9103 [MSA T 71-202, 0/28/6/53]
Plats from equity in plats.net
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT (Equity Papers) Wanda Goetz and Charles A. Bell vs. Hiram E. Smith and wife, 1946, Box 215 File No. 9161 [MSA T 71-205, 0/28/6/56]
"Remembering a park for all." The Baltimore Sun, 23 September 2002.
Related cases: Shelley v. Kraemer (334 U.S. 1), McGhee v. Sipes, Hurd v. Hodge, Uriciolo v. Hodge.
Other cases involving Hiram E. Smith:
Bearman v. Roland Park Realty Co., 218 Md. 515 (No. 91, September Term, 1958)
Smith v. Smith, 227 Md. 355 (No. 126, September Term, 1961)
The Beechwood Forest properties were foreclosed on in 1962 and 1963:
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT (Equity Papers) Doris L. Freeny, Assignee v. Hiram E. Smith and Lula E. Smith, Box 20 File No. 15028 [MSA T 71, 0/31/14/20]
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT (Equity Papers) Alvin Lapides, Assignee v. Hiram Em Smith and Lula E. Smith, Box 27 File No. 15542 [MSA T 71, 0/31/14/27]
|
|
|
|
MSA SC 5339-264-26
|
|
Eliezer
|
|
|
|
Contact the Department of Special Collections for location.
|
Description
State v. John Gurry
121 Md. 534 (1913) (Lexis)
121 Md. 534 (1913)
Appellate Court Records:
COURT OF APPEALS (Docket) State v. John
Gurry, 1913, April Term, no. 70, p. 418 [MSA S412-16, 1/67/6/2].
COURT OF APPEALS (Opinions) State v.
John Gurry, 1913, April Term, no. 70 [MSA S393-163, 1/65/14/13].
No Misc. Papers [MSA S397] or Records and Briefs [MSA S1733]. Because the case was heard by the Court of Appeals on an expedited schedule, it is possible that no written briefs were filed. A copy of the Record of the case is in the Criminal Papers.
Trial Court Records:
BALTIMORE CITY CRIMINAL COURT
(Criminal Docket) State v. John H. Gurry, 1911, pp. 353 and 597, case no. 2118 [MSA C1849-120, 3/30/4/5].
BALTIMORE CITY CRIMINAL COURT (Criminal Papers) State v. John H. Gurry, 1911, case no. 2118, box no. 140 [MSA T495-153, HF/2/34/56].
No Transcript [MSA T496].
Other Material:
Garrett Power, "Apartheid Baltimore Style: The Residential Segregation
Ordinances of 1910-1913," Maryland Law Review 42 (1983), 289-328.
Gilbert T. Stephenson, The
Segregation of the White and Negro Races in Cities, South Atlantic Quarterly, January, 1914, XIII, pp. 1-17.
|
|
